I met a client last week for coffee and I found myself recommending the work of Adam Kahane - an amazing facilitator who has worked on some really challenging issues (e.g. forming the new South Africa, drug cultures in South America, climate change etc) and written some of the most inspiring books I've read in a while.
I could wax lyrical about this man but what surprised me was that I had not thought about him for a while. Given this guy is a bit of a hero to me I found it a bit strange that I'd lost sight of his work and had to go and look him up all over again and get re-energised.
So I was wondering if anyone else out there has lost sight of any of their sources of inspiration and might need to reconnect to what has meaning and heart for them.
Here's a link of Adam talking at the RSA (34 min) - hope he does it for you too! Happy Christmas!
Tuesday, 27 December 2011
Friday, 23 December 2011
Tuesday, 20 December 2011
Working with ‘Problem children’ – issues in coaching
Don’t get me wrong I love coaching 1-2-1 but have learnt to
be wary when I’m asked to work with an organisation's ‘problem child’ – that person
who doesn’t seem to quite fit in, or whose behaviours have ruffled feathers. “We
need you to work with them” is often code for “We need you to fix them for us so
they fit in”
My concern about this sort of request is that it puts the
focus solely on the ‘problem child’ as opposed to the relationships at work. It
is unfortunately all too common for example, to find that the ‘problem child’
has never had direct feedback and that the team they form part of have never
had courageous conversations about how they are working together. In this
situation the coach risks becoming some sort of surrogate for conversations
that really ought to happen at work.
My concern about this sort of request is that it puts the
focus solely on the ‘problem child’ as opposed to the relationships at work. It
is unfortunately all too common for example, to find that the ‘problem child’
has never had direct feedback and that the team they form part of have never
had courageous conversations about how they are working together. In this
situation the coach risks becoming some sort of surrogate for conversations
that really ought to happen at work.
The most effective coaching assignments are those where the
work includes the wider team rather than a ‘fix it’ conducted in splendid
isolation. Coaching can’t afford to be the outsourced difficult conversation. Views?
Tuesday, 13 December 2011
Don’t coach me, just tell me!
It happened again this week. I’m working with a group of
leaders on their coaching skills and we’re talking about potential objections
to using a coaching approach with their teams. “My team don’t want loads of
questions, they don’t want me dancing around the handbags with them, they just
want to be told what to do !” one manager pronounces.
I think this comes back to what you think coaching is... if
you believe it us some form of elaborate guessing game then I can see how you
can get in this sort of tangle. It would indeed be perverse to withhold useful
information or expertise from a team member, making them play ‘read the bosses
mind’ instead. No wonder their people regard 'coaching' as time wasting and potentially manipulative. However if you see
coaching as a thinking partnership between two consenting and informed adults
then maybe these confusions can be avoided.
Great coaching is always based on a relationship of trust
and openness - leading questions and
pointless obstruction destroy both.
Tuesday, 6 December 2011
People Data – getting the wrong end of the stick.
I've become a bit worried about how we use people measurement tools of late - too often I think we confuse measuring something with changing something. Anyone who has been on a diet knows that the scales don't make us thinner ... even if we'd like to pretend it does.
This issue was brilliantly illustrated by a Global team I worked with recently who were struggling to find more effective ways of working together.
I'd used a team 'climate' survey with them to provoke conversations about how they worked together. Each regional sub-teams were tasked
with setting up a meeting to discuss their particular slice of the data. Most
managers grabbed the opportunity and were able to have a very different (and
better) conversation with their teams resulting in some really helpful changes. However
one manager sent out the data in an email to his team with a directive to improve the lowest scores. Any coincidence that this was the group with the poorest overall scores in the first place?
So how does your organisation use ‘people data’? As a tool
to provoke constructive dialogue and change or incite recriminations and yet more measurement?
Tuesday, 29 November 2011
The curse of perfectionism - issues in coaching
I was recently called in to work with a team who by any objective
measure could be described as ‘high-performing’. They were leaders in their
industry, consistently produced great results and had the respect of their peers and
customers alike. However, far from basking in the much justified praise they
received from all quarters, this was one of the most miserable and least
satisfied teams I have ever encountered. All they could see was how much they
had yet to do, and worst still, they saw each other as rivals and competitors. They were in very real
danger of fracturing as a group and destroying their hard won reputation.
None of this made too much sense until it occurred to me
that this was a group cursed with perfectionism. They had impossibly high standards for themselves – nothing less than
perfection was good enough them and even perfection probably didn’t cut it.
Rather than motivating them, their self imposed expectations were leading to
paralysis, inaction and in-fighting. What really
made the difference for this group was discovering – to their huge
surprise- that they all carried a strong sense of failure and under-achievement, and
assumed that their peers were more able/bright/together (fill in the blank)
than they were. And strangely enough just by being able to see their assumptions they were able to start the conversation to fix the situation.
So... where are you expecting of yourself? Progress or perfection?
Tuesday, 22 November 2011
The Killer Question
The Art and Architecture of the Powerful Question
You've heard about the ‘killer question’- it’s that one knock-out question that will unlock our coaching client, springing them neatly into expanded awareness, sustained behavioural change and purposeful action. Sadly I have yet to come across such a question – at least not one that is guaranteed to work on all occasions and with all clients - so forgive me for a dollop of scepticism on this subject! My ‘best’ questions seem to arise in the moment from my own curiosity and are often the simplest. Having said this however, I do know that some questions are more powerful than others – asking ‘what are you doing at the weekend?’ is patentedly different from ‘what are you doing with your life?’.
I came across an interesting analysis of the 'architecture' of powerful questions which suggests that we coaches should pay attention to three aspects of our questioning if we want them to be impactful:
I came across an interesting analysis of the 'architecture' of powerful questions which suggests that we coaches should pay attention to three aspects of our questioning if we want them to be impactful:
· Depth – do we tend to ask surface questions of fact or deeper questions of feeling, meaning and purpose? A ‘why’ questions is always going to be more powerful than a ‘when’ or ‘where’ question - even if you have to ask it more carefully.
· Breadth – do we ask big enough questions? Are we interested in just the 'weekend' or the 'life'? Do we ask questions just about the presenting issue or about the systemic context?
· Breadth – do we ask big enough questions? Are we interested in just the 'weekend' or the 'life'? Do we ask questions just about the presenting issue or about the systemic context?
· Hidden assumption– if all questions contain an assumption (discuss!) do we help our clients to unpick the assumptions inherent in the questions they are asking themselves and perhaps find a better question
Would love to hear your favourite ‘killer question’...
Click here for a copy of ‘The art of powerful questions’ by Vogt, Brown and Isaacs (2003)
Labels:
Coaching skills,
David Isaacs,
Eric Vogt,
Juanita Brown,
Questions,
techniques in coaching,
untangle
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




